Obama and company continue to demonstrate their complete lack of common sense in handling any foreign policy. Kerry says the Taliban having increased incentive to kidnap Americans is ‘baloney’. Well for the country that does not negotiate with terrorists…we just did so. Why wouldn’t the Taliban and others attempt to kidnap Americans, they did so and it worked obviously. Kerry says “These guys pick a fight with us in the future or now or at any time at enormous risk.” Why would anyone believe Kerry and Obama’s empty threats? This administration is more likely to act against it’s own citizens best interests than to carry out any threat against a foreign power or group. Obama frees Taliban criminals in exchange for one American of dubious nature while doing nothing to help an American Christian woman imprisoned with her children in Sudan for the crime of professing faith in Jesus Christ–facing death at their hands. Anyone see anything wrong with this picture? Same thing with Pastor Saeed Abedini. Iran brutalizes and tortures an American pastor while Obama does nothing and gives Iran a free pass.
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State John Kerry said on Sunday that he felt confident the five Taliban detainees freed in a swap for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl posed little risk to Americans, adding that Qatari officials were not the only ones monitoring them — and that while the five might be able to return to the battlefield, “they also have the ability to get killed doing that.”
Mr. Kerry, in some of his first public remarks on the exchange, struck a decidedly tough tone, dismissing as “baloney” the suggestion that terrorists would have new incentive to kidnap Americans. He also hinted, without offering details, that the United States had the means to monitor the Taliban members, who are now in Qatar, and act against them if necessary.
The Qataris “aren’t the only ones keeping an eye on them,” Mr. Kerry said on the CNN program “State of the Union.” He added, “These guys pick a fight with us in the future or now or at any time at enormous risk.”
Despite the determined defense of administration decisions by officials like Mr. Kerry, the firestorm of criticism over the exchange continued unabated on Sunday, with Republican lawmakers and one senior Democrat publicly expressing fresh doubts.
The administration received key support, however, from an influential retired military leader, Gen. James N. Mattis, who said that the exchange would make it easier now to attack the extremist groups involved in Sergeant Bergdahl’s detention.
Up to now, the general said, every time commanders weighed an attack on the Haqqani network, which operates on both sides of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, “we were concerned that Bowe Bergdahl could end up dead.”
That concern is gone, he said, also on CNN. “There’s also a freedom to operate against them that perhaps we didn’t fully enjoy,” he said.
General Mattis, who headed the United States Central Command from 2010 to 2013, with responsibility for Afghanistan, also argued that the Qataris, with “some of their own prestige at stake,” had reason to monitor the Taliban officials closely.
Like Mr. Kerry, the general dismissed the idea that the swap might inspire terror groups to kidnap Americans, saying, “It’s not like all of a sudden they have a new impulse here.”
Key members of Congress have expressed serious concerns that the administration failed to inform them in advance of the Bergdahl exchange.
On Sunday, the leaders of the Intelligence Committees in both chambers, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California and Representative Mike Rogers of Michigan, raised the question of why the administration had backed away from a goal enunciated in 2011: to make the Bergdahl deal the first step in a broader, behind-the-scenes effort to reach a reconciliation agreement with the Taliban.
Ms. Feinstein, a Democrat, also said that she found it hard to accept Mr. Kerry’s assurances that the Taliban members could be kept securely in Doha, the capital of Qatar. Previous negotiations, she said, had included a requirement for the house arrest of the five, in contrast to the current arrangement, which reportedly will allow them to move about the country.
“You can’t help but worry about them in Doha,” she said on the CBS program “Face the Nation.” “And we have no information on how the United States is actually going to see that they remain in Doha, that they make no comments, that they do no agitation.”
Mr. Rogers, a Republican, went further, saying that he was convinced that at least three of the Taliban members, and perhaps all five, would try to return to the battlefield. In the meantime, he said on the ABC program “This Week,” they can meet in Qatar with other Taliban figures, or with visiting family members, and send messages by courier to Afghanistan or Pakistan.
Mr. Rogers said he did not expect the five to plan anything “operational,” that is, to plan attacks. But he said the conditions of their time in Qatar would allow them “to prepare for what’s next.”
SOURCE: The New York Times
Thank you for donating to The Olive, any amount helps. We derive no revenue of any kind from this site other then donations received. We appreciate your support in the fight against liberalism, political correctness, so-med terrorism, and the removal of God in this country.
Don't forget to follow The Olive Branch Report on Facebook and Twitter. Now available on your Amazon Kindle Device. Please help spread the word about us, share our articles on your favorite social networks.
Viewpoints expressed herein are of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted or linked therein, and do not necessarily represent those of The Olive Branch Report