Wow. This bit of news comes from an unexpected source, two of them in fact. MSNBC… AND… Chris Matthews!
On Thursday evening Matthews was recapping the days events when he was forced to explain a very important bit of news to his viewers; Comey’s testimony had exonerated Trump of possible collusion with the Russians.
Matthews was likely speaking about a pair of important moments during Comey’s testimony when he called a New York Times report about Trump’s so-called collusion with Russia, “Nonsense.”
“It was not true. … The challenge, and I’m not picking on reporters, about writing stories about classified information is the people talking about it often don’t really know what’s going on, and those of us that actually know what’s going on are not talking about it,” Comey explained.
“And we don’t call the press to say, ‘hey, you got this thing wrong about this sensitive topic,’” he continued. “We just have to leave it there … nonsense. But I can’t go on explaining why it’s nonsense.”
Matthews argued that Comey’s decision to call Trump a liar was important but the most important information to come out of his testimony was the fact that Comey all but absolved Trump of collusion.
I think the headlines in terms of wire service coverage is he called the president a liar. I think that’s a headline. He also said the reason he memorialized everything, wrote memos after every meeting because he thought the president would lie about it. He also said I’d like to see any tapes played. If there are any White House tapes he wants them played.
The bigger story, Nicole touched on it there, the assumption of the president’s critics, his pursuers you might say, is that some time in the last year, the president had something to do with colluding with the Russians –something to do, a helping hand, to feeding their desire to affect the election in some way. Some role they played. Some conversation with Michael Flynn or Paul Manafort.
But yet what came apart this morning was that theory.
Two regards, the president said, according to the written tell me of Mr. Comey: Go ahead and get anybody satellite to my operation and nail them. I’m with you on that. That would mean Manafort, Carter Page, somebody like that.
And then what was fascinating, Comey said that basically Flynn wasn’t central to the Russia investigation, that he was touching on it. Of course, Flynn wasn’t honest in the answering of the official forms to become national security head, but they only touched on that, that it wasn’t related to that but that he could be flipped for that. In other words, they could flip him because they had him on something he dishonestly answered, but it wasn’t central to the Russia thing.
I always assumed what Trump was afraid of he had something to Flynn and Flynn could be flipped on that, and Flynn would testify against the president that he had some conversation with Flynn in terms of dealing with the Russians affirmatively. And if that’s not the case, where’s the there there?
If it isn’t Manafort, because he wants to throw him under the bus, and Flynn wasn’t central, where is the concern that Trump has that has put him on defense for these months? That’s my question coming out of the morning hearing.
Republished with permission Constitution.com
Thank you for donating to The Olive, any amount helps. We derive no revenue of any kind from this site other then donations received. We appreciate your support in the fight against liberalism, political correctness, so-med terrorism, and the removal of God in this country.
Don't forget to follow The Olive Branch Report on Facebook and Twitter. Now available on your Amazon Kindle Device. Please help spread the word about us, share our articles on your favorite social networks.
Viewpoints expressed herein are of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted or linked therein, and do not necessarily represent those of The Olive Branch Report